Divide articles you find into three groups:
Group 1: What is the problem?
What problem needs a solution? What question needs to be answered? What theory needs to be tested?
Group 2: What work has been done on “The Problem”?
What work has already been done? (or how has the theory already been tested?)
Group 3: What are the flaws/gaps in the work done on “The Problem”?
In the articles you read, what are the GAPS, the unanswered questions? What questions were NEVER ASKED but should have been?
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿